Monthly Archives: January 2017

Book Bits | 28 January 2017

A Man for All Markets: From Las Vegas to Wall Street, How I Beat the Dealer and the Market
By Edward O. Thorp
Summary via publisher (Random House)
e.thorpeThe incredible true story of the card-counting mathematics professor who taught the world how to beat the dealer and, as the first of the great quantitative investors, ushered in a revolution on Wall Street. A child of the Great Depression, legendary mathematician Edward O. Thorp invented card counting, proving the seemingly impossible: that you could beat the dealer at the blackjack table. As a result he launched a gambling renaissance. His remarkable success—and mathematically unassailable method—caused such an uproar that casinos altered the rules of the game to thwart him and the legions he inspired.
Continue reading

Trade War Or Bust?

In its first week in office, the Trump administration has reaffirmed that trade agreements are in the crosshairs. The Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) was the first victim. Trade between Mexico and the US appears to be the next domino to fall. The US stock market, so far, doesn’t seem to have a problem with the rise of anti-trade actions and rhetoric in Washington. But the slowing and perhaps the reversing of the decades-long policy of embracing free trade comes with risks for the US economy.
Continue reading

The Capital Spectator Named A Top Econ/Finance Blog

FocusEconomics, a consultancy, named The Capital Spectator as one of the “Top Economics & Finance Blogs of 2017”. It’s a high honor, in part because CapitalSpectator.com appears with 100 other distinguished sites. I’m familiar with most of the bloggers who made the cut, but there are several sites that are new to me. Overall, it’s an amazing list of resources for econ and finance. Congrats to all!

focus.eco.26jan2017

 

Analyzing Portfolios With Risk-Factor Profiles

Most investment portfolios are a collection of risk factors, such as exposure to credit and equity risk. Monitoring and managing these factors is critical. The standard approach is reviewing portfolios through a plain-vanilla asset allocation lens – 60% stocks, 30% bonds, 10% cash, for instance. But the standard methodology is a blunt instrument. For a clearer view of what’s driving your portfolio, decomposing risk with factor-based analysis offers a higher level of insight.
Continue reading